Yes, correct. Both pump actions.
Reason, @Supaduke?
Although a fair bit more expensive, I have handled both. The Henry is well built and functional.
The Remington is all steel and generally a bit nicer. High gloss stock (if that’s your thing) nice blued reciever. I wouldn’t be sad with a Henry but in a direct comparison, The Remington is the nicer rifle.
1 Like
My remington ain’t all steel 
Google fieldmaster 572 buck skin tan
This is my actual firearm I got a couple of years ago off these blokes.
The Henry pumps are nice in octagonal barrels. I choose to get them all but. The original Erma Werke eg72 made in Germany which I’m pretty sure the Henry H003T is a copy of and a nice rare Remington 572 Buck skin tan model… I like the Henry’s/ Erma’s because they have the exposed hammers to decock them but some people don’t like the bolts coming back at their faces on the stock so if that’s a issue 4 u go the Remington 572 
In the safe 
Henry is definitely a clone of Erma, I think.
Issue? You make it sound like I’m all practical and shit. You just like pumpies. I am leaning towards Remington. But like you said, Henry with octagonal barrel is sexy.
Well the one I held sure fooled me. Looked like all steel. Nicely blued.
Turns out they used painted and anodized aluminium for the reciever. I never knew.
Still, the ones I played with seemed very nice.
I also prefered the pistol grip on the 572
I think 572 is just way classy… Nice range gun and what not. Would not take it bush lol
Great, and now I want one.
Would go well with a peep sight as a plinker for sure.
That makes both of us.
It go the Henry, but I’m old fashioned.
The octagonal barrel and exposed hammer Just look cooler in a plinking gun
2 Likes
I like your style
1 Like
So have you made up your mind which one your going to buy first?
Coz you know you’ll get both eventually!
You know me too well. I have not made up my mind. I am not sure yet. 
"stock shortened. " - no thanks.